From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6VILoRw008414 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:21:50 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.3/Submit) id g6VILoYW008413 for linux-mips-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:21:50 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (shaft17-f75.dialo.tiscali.de [62.246.17.75]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g6VILhRw008404 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:21:45 -0700 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6VIMxc05139; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:22:59 +0200 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:22:59 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: "Kevin D. Kissell" , Carsten Langgaard , linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [patch] MIPS64 R4k TLB refill CP0 hazards Message-ID: <20020731202259.D4892@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <005001c23863$e077caa0$10eca8c0@grendel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 01:49:57PM +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 01:49:57PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hmm, I think that's an overkill, although for debugging purposes, a > single extremely conservative handler (possibly with some status output to > the log) might be selectable as an alternative. Look at the C variation of the exception handler in the mips64 code. It was pretty useful to add debugging checks during early mips64 development. Ralf