Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Dharm <mdharm@momenco.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: linux_2_4: add support for the Ocelot-G board
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 13:40:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020902134053.A28347@momenco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020902224615.A17378@linux-mips.org>; from ralf@linux-mips.org on Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:46:15PM +0200

Hrm... okay... first question, where do I get the 64-bit toolchain?  Right
now, I'm using HJ's toolchain RPMs (from over a year ago -- I should update
those).

Second, what about all those nifty extras?  Things like the fact that
kseg0/1 (well, their 64-bit equivalents) are now larger (how big are they,
anyway) so they can map all of my SDRAM as well as most (all?) of my
I/O space... I guess for that I need to reprogram all my address decoders,
and then that sort of thing must be what the arch/mips64/* stuff is for.
Yes? No?  Or am I smoking something too strong again?

The 64/32 mixed-mode linux is certainly of some interest to our customers,
but full 64-bit is really where the demand is.  Is there anything that a
non-compiler guy can do to help the effort along?

Matt

On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:46:15PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:38:50PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> 
> > Oh, I agree that a 64-bit kernel makes sense.  I'm just not sure what is
> > needed to get from where I am now to where I want to be.
> > 
> > There is _much_ interest from our customers for 64-bit linux.  Especially
> > if the toolchain catches up so that we can have 64-bit userspace.
> 
> The toolchain stuff is being worked on.  Hold your breath but cheat every
> once in a while when your face turns blue ;-)
> 
> > Anyone have some quick pointers on how to get from here to there?
> 
> The basic receipe is easy.  The 64-bit kernel has a binary compatibility
> layer that allows you to use 32-bit software with no changes.  Just use
> a 64-bit compiler, for now that's probably still the egcs 1.1.2 /
> binutils 2.9.5 based mips64-linux / mips64el-linux tool chain.  Using your
> old .config file do a "make ARCH=mips64 oldconfig" etc.  The resulting
> binary file will be a 32-bit ELF file so you can just feed that to your
> firmware for booting as usual.  Problems may be hit along the way ;-)
> 
>   Ralf

-- 
Matthew Dharm                              Work: mdharm@momenco.com
Senior Software Designer, Momentum Computer

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-02 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <NEBBLJGMNKKEEMNLHGAIKEJOCIAA.mdharm@momenco.com>
2002-09-02 17:00 ` PATCH: linux_2_4: add support for the Ocelot-G board Ralf Baechle
2002-09-02 19:38   ` Matthew Dharm
2002-09-02 20:46     ` Ralf Baechle
2002-09-02 20:40       ` Matthew Dharm [this message]
2002-09-02 22:03         ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020902134053.A28347@momenco.com \
    --to=mdharm@momenco.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox