Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: Hartvig Ekner <hartvige@mips.com>,
	"Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>,
	Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no>,
	Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 11:14:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020905151409.GA25023@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1020905170830.7444E-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:10:51PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > No - the point is that all data types have the same size in N32.  It
> > was created explicitly as a transitional sop for people who didn't want
> > to fix their code, but wanted a performance increase from their 64-bit
> > hardware.
> 
>  Well, what's the performance increase of n32 over o32?  The increased
> number of argument registers?  I doubt it's noticeable in most cases.

N32 supports saving and restoring 64-bit registers, which O32 doesn't -
according to some comments in GCC, O32 is in fact incompatible with
using 64-bit operations.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-05 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-05  9:30 64-bit and N32 kernel interfaces Tor Arntsen
2002-09-05 11:47 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 12:48   ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-09-05 12:48     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-09-05 14:09     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 14:20       ` Hartvig Ekner
2002-09-05 14:20         ` Hartvig Ekner
2002-09-05 14:54         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 14:59           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 15:10             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 15:14               ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-09-05 16:16                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 16:19                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 16:33                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 16:39                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 17:16                         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 17:29                   ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-09-05 17:29                     ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-09-05 19:34                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-06  9:42                   ` Ralf Baechle
2002-09-05 18:07               ` Hartvig Ekner
2002-09-05 18:07                 ` Hartvig Ekner
2002-09-05 18:54                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 19:16                   ` Thiemo Seufer
2002-09-06  9:30               ` Ralf Baechle
2002-09-05 14:22       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 15:08         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 15:14           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 16:28             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 16:30           ` Thiemo Seufer
2002-09-05 16:54             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 17:44               ` Thiemo Seufer
2002-09-05 19:50                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 22:12                   ` Thiemo Seufer
2002-09-09 17:39                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-06 10:14           ` Ralf Baechle
2002-09-09 14:01             ` Dominic Sweetman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-04 13:56 Ralf Baechle
2002-09-04 14:14 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-04 14:31   ` Ralf Baechle
2002-09-04 15:19     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-04 18:46       ` Ralf Baechle
2002-09-05  9:53         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05  6:40       ` Carsten Langgaard
2002-09-05  9:23         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-05 13:41           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-04 17:32     ` Jun Sun
2002-09-04 17:56       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-04 18:40       ` Ralf Baechle
2002-09-05 10:15         ` Kjeld Borch Egevang
2002-09-05 10:15           ` Kjeld Borch Egevang
2002-09-09 20:20 ` Jay Carlson
2002-09-16 13:01 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-09-16 15:40   ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020905151409.GA25023@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=dan@debian.org \
    --cc=carstenl@mips.com \
    --cc=hartvige@mips.com \
    --cc=kevink@mips.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=tor@spacetec.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox