From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:24:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from crack.them.org ([65.125.64.184]:268 "EHLO crack.them.org") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:24:18 +0200 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17rfk7-0005hi-00; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:23:51 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17reo6-0004KJ-00; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:23:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:23:53 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Johannes Stezenbach Cc: "Steven J. Hill" , Stuart Hughes , Linux-MIPS Subject: Re: cannot debug multi-threaded programs with gdb/gdbserver Message-ID: <20020918132353.GA16211@nevyn.them.org> References: <3D876053.C2CD1D8C@zee2.com> <3D87653E.9030702@realitydiluted.com> <20020918121047.GA17744@convergence.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020918121047.GA17744@convergence.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 235 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: dan@debian.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:10:47PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > Steven J. Hill wrote: > > Stuart Hughes wrote: > > > > > >Does anyone know whether there is some special setup needed on > > >gdb/gdbserver to use the multi-threaded gdbserver ?? > ... > > >binutils: Version 2.11.90.0.25 > > > > > Don't use H.J. Lu's binutils, use the released one. Use gcc-3.2 and > > binutils-2.13 as they have fixes for the MIPS debugging symbols with > > regards to DWARF. > > Is this a general recommendation to avoid H.J. Lu's binutils, or do > you just favor the newer binutils version? > What about binutils 2.13.90.0.4? > > I'm currently using gcc-2.95.4 with the Debian patches, and > binutils binutils-2.12.90.0.14, which seem to work well. > I planned to switch to gcc-3.2 but postponed it because I > read about the DWARF debugging problems. Are they solved > with gcc-3.2 / binutils-2.13 / gdb-5.3-CVS ? Yes, they are fixed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer