Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Dinesh Nagpure <dinesh_nagpure@ivivity.com>
Cc: "'linux-mips@linux-mips.org'" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: KSeg0 coherency policy selection.
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:02:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021023180222.B27187@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AEC4671C8179D61194DE0002B328BDD2070C8C@ATLOPS>; from dinesh_nagpure@ivivity.com on Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 06:47:27AM -0400

On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 06:47:27AM -0400, Dinesh Nagpure wrote:

> I am almost done with my porting of kernel 2.4.16 to our platform using
> RM5231A. But I had to make a couple of very basic hacks and I am trying to
> understand if there is any way I can avoid them.
> First the memcpy wouldn't work for me properly, both the compiler generated
> and also the one under arch/mips/lib/memcpy.c, so I had to change the lib
> version to do byte copy. I know this is a very crude change but things
> worked.

Memcpy.c?  I assume that's a typo.  We retired the C version of memcopy like
5 years ago.  Memcpy.S recently received a few fixes but those were only
rather estotheric special cases; chances are these bugs are not what's
hitting you.

> Second, the Kseg0 coherency algorithm selection in the function
> ld_mmu_r4xx0( ) seems to be improper for RM5231A, This function sets the CP0
> config register K0 field to 3 which as per RM5231A user manual is Cacheable,
> noncoherent, write back policy Should this not be set to 0, which is
> cacheable, non-coherent, write-through, no write allocate? 

Caching algorithem 3 is should be right for every uniprocessor MIPS system.
The only cache coherency attributes that are standard accross all MIPS CPUs
are modes 2 and 3.

> Also from the knowledge base I understand there is a cache aliasing problem
> associated with RM5231A when page size is set to 4KB. The document
> recommends to invalidate the cache before retiring a virtual page OR
> coloring of the pages. Can someone tell me if this fix is already taken care
> of? For me when I enable caching under "Kernel hacking" my kernel crashes
> with page fault, when it tries to run bin/init, consistently.

There have been fixes in that are as well since 2.4.16 but nothing that
explains crashes as early as when booting init.

  Ralf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-23 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-23 10:47 KSeg0 coherency policy selection Dinesh Nagpure
2002-10-23 14:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-10-23 16:02 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-23 18:05 Dinesh Nagpure
2002-10-23 18:46 ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021023180222.B27187@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=dinesh_nagpure@ivivity.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox