From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 26 Oct 2002 01:41:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from p508B69CC.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.139.105.204]:19857 "EHLO p508B69CC.dip.t-dialin.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 01:41:53 +0200 Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com ([IPv6:::ffff:204.127.202.61]:51080 "EHLO sccrmhc01.attbi.com") by ralf.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 01:41:47 +0200 Received: from lucon.org ([12.234.88.146]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20021025234132.TDAH27756.sccrmhc01.attbi.com@lucon.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 23:41:32 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5756F2C4EC; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:41:32 -0700 From: "H. J. Lu" To: Roland McGrath Cc: GNU C Library , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix errlist for mips Message-ID: <20021025164132.A23230@lucon.org> References: <20021020172331.A26834@lucon.org> <200210252336.g9PNaww03056@magilla.sf.frob.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200210252336.g9PNaww03056@magilla.sf.frob.com>; from roland@redhat.com on Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:36:58PM -0700 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 517 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hjl@lucon.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:36:58PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > You know better than I what existing mips libc.so.6 ABIs have for the size > of sys_errlist. But for the current version, 123 omits many of the errno > values I see in asm-mips/errno.h, and EDQUOT really is 1133. So I don't > see how your change can be right. That is what was in glibc 2.0 for mips. However, glibc 2.2 is the first glibc version I worked on. I don't have any mips binaries compiled against glibc 2.0. As far as I know, none of glibc prior to the one with all my mips patches applied ever worked 100% correct on mips. H.J.