From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:14:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from crack.them.org ([65.125.64.184]:64004 "EHLO crack.them.org") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:14:19 +0200 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 185WNK-0004oF-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:13:34 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 185VSB-0002x1-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:14:31 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:14:31 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: Roland McGrath , GNU C Library , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix errlist for mips Message-ID: <20021026181431.GA11105@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "H. J. Lu" , Roland McGrath , GNU C Library , linux-mips@linux-mips.org References: <20021020172331.A26834@lucon.org> <200210252336.g9PNaww03056@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20021025164132.A23230@lucon.org> <20021026044549.GA15461@nevyn.them.org> <20021025215543.A26333@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021025215543.A26333@lucon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 522 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: dan@debian.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 09:55:43PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 12:45:49AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Not everyone uses your MIPS patches; I have a completely functional > > MIPS system with: > > 0019df30 l O .data 000011b8 _new_sys_errlist > > 0019df30 l O .data 000001ec _old_sys_errlist > > It doesn't tell anything. Please, please show size of sys_errlist in > glibc 2.0 for mips. I am not even sure if you can run mips binaries > compiled against glibc 2.0 with glibc 2.2/2.3. I didn't use 2.0 for MIPS either. And I got the wrong impression from your last message; sorry! Here's what my MIPS glibc has: 0019df30 g DO .data 000001ec (GLIBC_2.0) sys_errlist 0019df30 g DO .data 000011b8 GLIBC_2.2 sys_errlist 0019df30 g DO .data 000001ec (GLIBC_2.0) _sys_errlist 0019df30 g DO .data 000011b8 GLIBC_2.2 _sys_errlist So: I don't know where the GLIBC_2.1 version came from, or why we need a GLIBC_2.3 version, or why we should change the size of the GLIBC_2.0 version. Your patch looks good; should you wipe the GLIBC_2.1 version also? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer