From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 06 Nov 2002 04:53:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com ([204.127.202.62]:32480 "EHLO sccrmhc02.attbi.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 04:53:26 +0100 Received: from lucon.org ([12.234.88.146]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20021106035318.SJXJ1928.sccrmhc02.attbi.com@lucon.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 03:53:18 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 058AB2C57C; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 19:53:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 19:53:16 -0800 From: "H. J. Lu" To: Roland McGrath Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , GNU C Library , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix errlist for mips Message-ID: <20021105195316.A2671@lucon.org> References: <20021105192328.A2230@lucon.org> <200211060344.gA63ikk18094@magilla.sf.frob.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200211060344.gA63ikk18094@magilla.sf.frob.com>; from roland@redhat.com on Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 07:44:46PM -0800 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 581 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hjl@lucon.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 07:44:46PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 06:53:17PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > > Here's what my MIPS glibc has: > > > > 0019df30 g DO .data 000001ec (GLIBC_2.0) sys_errlist > > > > 0019df30 g DO .data 000011b8 GLIBC_2.2 sys_errlist > > > > 0019df30 g DO .data 000001ec (GLIBC_2.0) _sys_errlist > > > > 0019df30 g DO .data 000011b8 GLIBC_2.2 _sys_errlist > > > > > > Ok, that says sys_nerr=123 in 2.0 and sys_nerr=1134 in 2.2. > > > I have changed the map to have just those. > > > > Please keep in mind that the next version is GLIBC_2.1, not > > GLIBC_2.2. The reason you see GLIBC_2.2 is GLIBC_2.2 is the > > first versioned ABI for MIPS. > > I don't think it's meaningful to make the distinction. If we wrote > GLIBC_2.1, shlib-versions causes it to be GLIBC_2.2, but that's more > confusing. Now it says GLIBC_2.2, and that's what you get. There was > never a "sys_errlist@GLIBC_2.1" symbol in any binary, so it doesn't make > sense to have that version set. But you will only see sys_errlist in GLIBC_2.1 in Versions in glibc 2.2. H.J.