From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: Alignment of FP Context Storage
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:33:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021118143353.A12096@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <015201c28f05$cb583800$10eca8c0@grendel>; from kevink@mips.com on Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:24:06PM +0100
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:24:06PM +0100, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:
> I'm cleaning up some old Linux kernel sandboxes, and
> came across a patch which I had long ago made in a
> local copy of include/asm-mips/processor.h but which
> does not seem to have been propagated more widely.
> I had added "__attribute__((aligned(8))))" to the
> declarations of the mips_fpu_hard_struct and
> mips_fpu_soft_struct data structures, presumably
> because there was a need to ensure 64-bit alignment
> of the elements so that LDC1 instructions would work.
> We don't generally have a problem here, presumably
> because either the previous data declarations naturally
> align things to 64-bits, or because we've ensured things
> at a higher level of makfile compiler directives. Are we
> in fact guarnateed to be safe without the source code
> directive, or should those __attribute__ directives be
> added as insurance?
The definition of mips_cpu_hard_struct uses doubles which is ensuring
mips_fpu_hard_struct will have 64-bit alignment. This is actually part
of thread_struct which itself has 8kB alignment on 32-bit and 16kB
alignment on 64-bit.
Ralf
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-18 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-18 13:24 Alignment of FP Context Storage Kevin D. Kissell
2002-11-18 13:24 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-11-18 13:33 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021118143353.A12096@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=kevink@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox