From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: atul srivastava <atulsrivastava9@rediffmail.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: watch exception only for kseg0 addresses..?
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:18:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021125131807.B12113@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1021125123643.8769B-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:55:11PM +0100
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:55:11PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > The whole watch stuff in the the kernel is pretty much an ad-hoc API
> > which I did create to debug a stack overflow. I'm sure if you're
> > going to use it you'll find problems. For userspace for example you'd
> > have to switch the watch register when switching the MMU context so
> > each process gets it's own virtual watch register. Beyond that there
> > are at least two different formats of watch registers implemented in
> > actual silicon, the original R4000-style and the MIPS32/MIPS64 style
> > watch registers and the kernel's watch code only know the R4000 style
> > one. So check your CPU's manual ...
>
> I think the best use of the watch exception would be making it available
> to userland via PTRACE_PEEKUSR and PTRACE_POKEUSR for hardware watchpoint
> support (e.g. for gdb). Hardware support is absolutely necessary for
> watching read accesses and much beneficial for write ones (otherwise gdb
> single-steps code which sucks performace-wise).
Agreed. And because such an extension would be fully backward compatible
introduction is no problem. So time to come up with a reasonable API.
MIPS32 / MIPS64 extend the R4000's watch capabilities significantly,
something we don't want to ignore.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-25 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-25 7:52 watch exception only for kseg0 addresses..? atul srivastava
2002-11-25 9:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-11-25 11:55 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-11-25 12:18 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2002-11-25 14:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-25 15:08 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-11-25 15:47 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-04 0:37 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-12-04 0:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-04 15:48 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-11-25 15:30 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-04 0:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-04 15:45 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-04 15:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-04 17:54 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-11 16:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-11 17:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-11 18:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-12 11:15 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021125131807.B12113@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=atulsrivastava9@rediffmail.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox