From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:53:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p508B796B.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.121.107]:28343 "EHLO dea.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:53:24 +0000 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1KIrE602557; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 19:53:14 +0100 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 19:53:14 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [patch] Cobalt IRQ handler CP0 interlock? Message-ID: <20030220195314.C30853@linux-mips.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 06:31:02PM +0100 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 1474 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Does Cobalt have a processor that implements its pipeline differently or > interlocks on CP0 loads? If not, I'll apply the following fix. Mfc0 doesn't need a nops on any R4000 class CPU I know of. Ralf