From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Subject: Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 23:55:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030515035507.GA4654@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030513195928.GB16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:59:28PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > Just for completeness: I had to use:
> > > > GCCFLAGS += -mabi=32 -march=r4600 -mtune=r4600 -Wa,--trap
> > > > to make gcc-3.3 happy (note the 32 instead of o32).
> > >
> > > Yes, IIRC 64 vs. n64 has the same problem.
> >
> > That's not quite the same: 64 is o64, n64 is n64.
>
> I don't think so (There's -mabi=o64).
> Otherwise I would have built all my NewABI 64bit Executables as
> o64 without noticing ever. :-)
You are, of course, right :)
> > GCC's never called the 32-bit ABI "o32".
>
> True, but it might be clearer if it did.
I suppose... too late now.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-15 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-18 15:41 -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18 Guido Guenther
2003-03-18 16:03 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-03-18 17:42 ` Guido Guenther
2003-03-18 19:08 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-03-18 23:24 ` Guido Guenther
2003-03-19 0:16 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-03-19 1:25 ` Guido Guenther
2003-05-13 11:33 ` Guido Guenther
2003-05-13 19:27 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-13 19:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-13 19:59 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-15 3:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-05-13 20:11 ` Guido Guenther
2003-05-13 20:50 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-13 22:22 ` Guido Guenther
2003-05-14 10:53 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-05-14 15:12 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-14 17:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-05-14 17:50 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-14 18:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-05-14 18:42 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-15 11:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-05-15 11:50 ` Thiemo Seufer
2003-05-15 12:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-03-26 16:05 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030515035507.GA4654@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=agx@sigxcpu.org \
--cc=ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox