Re: cvs glibc bug?

[Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>]

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 11:51:47PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> SI_TKILL is new in glibc and not yet ported to mips.
Well, the kernel's include/asm-mips/siginfo.h defines SI_KILL as -6
while glibc defines SI_ASYNCNL as -6. Is there a reason for this or is
this just a typo, all other architectures define the later as -60. If
it's a typo i'd like to keep this in sync with other architectures:
 
Index: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits/siginfo.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits/siginfo.h,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -u -r1.9 siginfo.h
--- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits/siginfo.h	5 Dec 2002 00:23:59 -0000	1.9
+++ sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits/siginfo.h	20 May 2003 12:57:08 -0000
@@ -119,8 +119,10 @@ typedef struct siginfo
    signals.  */
 enum
 {
-  SI_ASYNCNL = -6,		/* Sent by asynch name lookup completion.  */
+  SI_ASYNCNL = -60,		/* Sent by asynch name lookup completion.  */
 # define SI_ASYNCNL	SI_ASYNCNL
+  SI_TKILL = -6,		/* Sent by tkill. */
+# define SI_TKILL	SI_TKILL
   SI_SIGIO,			/* Sent by queued SIGIO. */
 # define SI_SIGIO	SI_SIGIO
   SI_MESGQ,			/* Sent by real time mesq state change.  */

Regards,
 -- Guido