Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Ashish anand <ashish.anand@inspiretech.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: Any complications of using CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED..?
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 11:26:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030527092649.GB23296@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200305210618.h4L6HqI9006634@smtp.inspirtek.com>

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:16:49AM +0530, Ashish anand wrote:

> I saw a good bit of discussion about CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED but
> still i am yet to know...
> 
> If I want to use CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED (ignoring performance)
> what all the side-effects and any restrictions that linux should
> take care in software ?
> 
> I observed something surprising on my R4k mips system(virtually indexed
> caches), after i use this option my driver never got status updation by
> device in transmit and receive decriptors in system memory , Irrespective
> of I (flushed+invalidate) caches or not...

Descriptors sounds like networking.  Network descriptors should usually
be stored in uncached or otherwise coherent space that is allocated
through pci_alloc_consistent anyway.  If you do that CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED
should not make any difference anymore.

> if i don't use CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED then before checking status I need to 
> (flush+invalidate) cache and whole thing works great...

That's a funny bug.  Normally the opposite behaviour would be expected for
a bug ...

  Ralf

      reply	other threads:[~2003-05-27  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-21  5:46 Any complications of using CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED..? Ashish anand
2003-05-27  9:26 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030527092649.GB23296@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ashish.anand@inspiretech.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox