From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:52:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from p508B5B34.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.91.52]:47312 "EHLO dea.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:52:48 +0100 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6MCqlDB015209; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:52:47 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6MCqlcv015208; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:52:47 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:52:47 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: David Kesselring Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: 64bit Sead build Message-ID: <20030722125247.GC12449@linux-mips.org> References: <20030721233649.GA6900@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 2854 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 08:40:30AM -0400, David Kesselring wrote: > Thanks for the info. I'm trying to build 64bit sead so that it can be a > basis for a port to our own chip with a MIPS 5kf core. Is one of the other > supported boards more generic (and thus a better start) than Sead? Btw, forgot to mention I put a fix for the problem you reported into CVS yesterday so building works. I don't have a SEAD so I wasn't able to test. Ralf