From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:24:28 +0100 (BST)
Received: from p508B5748.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.87.72]:18861
	"EHLO dea.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP
	id <S8225348AbTIJJY0>; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:24:26 +0100
Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8A9OJLT011168;
	Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:24:19 +0200
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h8A9OJcH011167;
	Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:24:19 +0200
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:24:19 +0200
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "??(zhufeng)" <zhufeng@koretide.com.cn>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: Can gcc support mips-pe now?
Message-ID: <20030910092419.GC10393@linux-mips.org>
References: <3F5D2141.4050002@avtrex.com> <MGEELAPMEFMLFBMDBLKLEEGFCFAA.zhufeng@koretide.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <MGEELAPMEFMLFBMDBLKLEEGFCFAA.zhufeng@koretide.com.cn>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Return-Path: <ralf@linux-mips.org>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 3149
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:06:44AM +0800, ??(zhufeng) wrote:

That's a binutils problem, if at all.  Again, Linux isn't Windows, we
don't need PECOFF.

  Ralf