From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: "Finney, Steve" <Steve.Finney@SpirentCom.COM>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: 64 bit operations w/32 bit kernel
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:47:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030930184755.GA12599@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030930195415.11368C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:04:42PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > > What would be the downside to enabling 64 bit operations in user space
> > > on a 32 bit kernel (setting the PX bit in the status register?). The
> > > particular issue is that I want to access 64 bit-memory mapped registers,
> > > and I really need to do it as an atomic operation. I tried borrowing
> > > sibyte/64bit.h from the kernel, but I get an illegal instruction on the
> > > double ops.
> >
> > Common design bug in hardware, imho ...
>
> Well, ioremap() can be used to get at these areas (as well as any
> others), whether we call it a bug or not.
What I called a bug is the necessity to access hardware registers with
64-bit loads and stores in some systems as opposed to of 32-bit
instructions - that simply doesn't work from 32-bit universes.
To clarify, it was my understanding of Steve's problem he needs 64-bit
loads and stores, not something in the 64-bit physical address space.
The later problem obviously would get a different answer.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-30 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-29 17:31 64 bit operations w/32 bit kernel Finney, Steve
2003-09-29 17:31 ` Finney, Steve
2003-09-29 19:01 ` Michael Uhler
2003-09-30 14:49 ` Kip Walker
2003-09-30 16:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-09-30 18:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-30 18:47 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2003-10-01 3:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-30 18:29 ` Michael Uhler
2003-09-30 19:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-30 19:27 ` Michael Uhler
2003-10-01 4:26 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-10-01 16:24 ` Ralf Baechle
2003-09-30 19:48 ` Ralf Baechle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-30 19:23 Finney, Steve
2003-09-30 19:23 ` Finney, Steve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030930184755.GA12599@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=Steve.Finney@SpirentCom.COM \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox