From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:26:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p508B62E6.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.98.230]:34478 "EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:26:01 +0000 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBT0Pqa5013139; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 01:25:52 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBT0Pps1013138; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 01:25:51 +0100 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 01:25:50 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: 2.5 n32 syscall numbers are wrong Message-ID: <20031229002550.GA13103@linux-mips.org> References: <20031223175732.GA26052@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031223175732.GA26052@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 3841 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 12:57:32PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > If you take a look at scall64-n32.S, you'll find that there's no hole after > sendfile64. But in there is. So glibc gets built with the > wrong number for clock_gettime and confusion ensues... Applied. I also fixed __NR_Linux_syscalls and __NR_N32_Linux_syscalls which also were off by one but didn't get fixed by your patch. Ralf