From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:08:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.total-knowledge.com ([IPv6:::ffff:209.157.135.102]:7079 "EHLO alpha.total-knowledge.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:08:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 22131 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2003 16:08:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.total-knowledge.com) (12.234.207.60) by alpha.total-knowledge.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Dec 2003 16:08:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 7473 invoked by uid 502); 30 Dec 2003 08:08:08 -0800 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:08:08 -0800 From: ilya@theIlya.com To: Dimitri Torfs Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: supported systems running on 2.6 ? Message-ID: <20031230160807.GB30019@gateway.total-knowledge.com> References: <20031230144904.GA10358@sonycom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031230144904.GA10358@sonycom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 3856 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ilya@theIlya.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Are you trying 2.6.0 from linux-mips.org CVS? If so, make sure it is no earlier then from yesterday. There was non-CPU specific bug that was just fixed. For reference: I have R212K-based SGI O2 running almost stable with 2.6.0. R5K O2's also boot, but show random segfaults and oopses, but I still do not know what exactly is the reason for that. Ilya. On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 03:49:04PM +0100, Dimitri Torfs wrote: > Hi, > > are there already MIPS systems running on 2.6.0 ? If so, which ones > ? I'm currently porting a VR41xx based configuration from 2.4.24 to > 2.6.0: boot sequence seems to be OK, but the init process doesn't > come up (it looks like its not properly laid out in memory, thus > continuously generating exceptions (do_signal()) ...). Is it too > soon to expect it to work ? > > Dimitri > > -- > Dimitri Torfs | NSCE > dimitri.torfs@sonycom.com | Sint Stevens Woluwestraat 55 > tel: +32 2 2908451 | 1130 Brussel > fax: +32 2 7262686 | Belgium > >