From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:46:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from p508B5C01.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.92.1]:40320
	"EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP
	id <S8225382AbUAMWqH>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:46:07 +0000
Received: from fluff.linux-mips.net (fluff.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0DMjwDs006132;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:45:58 +0100
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by fluff.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0DMjqAM006131;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:45:52 +0100
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:45:52 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
Cc: Dimitri Torfs <dimitri@sonycom.com>,
	Pete Popov <ppopov@mvista.com>, kph@cisco.com,
	Linux MIPS mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?
Message-ID: <20040113224552.GA6001@linux-mips.org>
References: <1074027809.20636.91.camel@shakedown> <1074028164.21857.120.camel@zeus.mvista.com> <20040113214454.GA2737@sonycom.com> <20040113143137.N11733@mvista.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040113143137.N11733@mvista.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Return-Path: <ralf@linux-mips.org>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 3933
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:31:37PM -0800, Jun Sun wrote:

> What is troubling me most is either rockhopper nor malta works on 2.6.

I have a success report with 2.6 on Malta from yesterday.  I'll check if
any patching was required but I'm interested in your Malta's configuration.

  Ralf