From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:32:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p508B6B36.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.107.54]:40482 "EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:32:19 +0000 Received: from fluff.linux-mips.net (fluff.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0KIW6ex006298; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:32:06 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by fluff.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0KIVvE8006288; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:31:57 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:31:57 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Pavel Kiryukhin Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: __MIPSEL__ in sys32_rt_sigtimedwait Message-ID: <20040120183157.GB5495@linux-mips.org> References: <400D6877.1000105@dev.rtsoft.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <400D6877.1000105@dev.rtsoft.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 4073 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:42:15PM +0300, Pavel Kiryukhin wrote: > Hi all, > my question - does endiannes matters in sigset translation in > sys32_rt_sigtimedwait (arch/mips/signal32.c)? Think about where bit 33 ends for a big endian machine with an without the conversion. Ralf