From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:51:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from witte.sonytel.be ([IPv6:::ffff:80.88.33.193]:43214 "EHLO witte.sonytel.be") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:51:57 +0000 Received: from teasel.sonytel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by witte.sonytel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0LEpMw1010434; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:51:22 +0100 (MET) Received: (from dimitri@localhost) by teasel.sonytel.be (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id PAA14329; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:51:20 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:51:20 +0100 From: Dimitri Torfs To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Support for newer gcc/gas options Message-ID: <20040121145120.GA14288@sonycom.com> References: <20031223114644.GA5458@sonycom.com> <20040120204026.GA9470@sonycom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 4079 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: dimitri@sonycom.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:09:12PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Dimitri Torfs wrote: > > > > It took a bit longer than I planned, sorry. Anyway, here are two > > > functionally equivalent patches, for 2.4 and the head, that remove an ISA > > > specification if a tool supports "-march=" and "-mabi=" at the same time. > > > Please try the appropriate one. > > > > Tried the head one, it had some typos (patch follows). Unfortunately, as I wrote > > Oops, thanks for the correction -- as I still have only gcc 2.95.4, I > wasn't able to see the typos immediately. > > > earlier, gcc-3.2 doesn't set the ISA correctly when using -march=, so > > it doesn't work for 3.2. > > But do we care of the ISA? I don't think so -- it's just a leftover from > the days the MIPS world was less complicated. If gcc 3.2 correctly emits > code for the selected processor and obeys the selected ABI, then > everything is fine. Are the binaries correct? If so, I'd like to apply > the patch. I actually had problems compiling when the -mips3 was not set. The compiler choked on compiling some empty file, if I remember correctly. I will try again later to see what exactly went wrong. Dimitri -- Dimitri Torfs | NSCE dimitri@sonycom.com | The Corporate Village tel: +32 2 7008541 | Da Vincilaan 7 - D1 fax: +32 2 7008622 | B-1935 Zaventem - Belgium