From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:40:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p508B76C0.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.118.192]:12407 "EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:40:12 +0000 Received: from fluff.linux-mips.net (fluff.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1AGdXex030723; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:39:34 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by fluff.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1AGdXiY030722; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:39:33 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:39:33 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [patch] irq_cpu.c clean-ups Message-ID: <20040210163933.GB30617@linux-mips.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 4329 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 05:19:33PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > The two copies of irq_cpu.c should both in theory and in practice be the > same, but for some reason they are not. Here's a patch for 2.4 to bring > them to sync. The next step would be a trivial update for 2.6 to make > that version the same as these two as well. > > OK to apply? Yes, Ralf