From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Emmanuel Michon <em@realmagic.fr>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: new platform
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 23:49:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040510214927.GB22442@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1084199090.12536.1314.camel@avalon.france.sdesigns.com>
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 04:24:51PM +0200, Emmanuel Michon wrote:
> I plan to port linux-mips to a a 32bit 4KEc based (little endian)
> hardware design.
>
> I have three questions:
>
> Q1- The nice book `see mips run' states that it's better that the
> physical address map fits entirely in kseg1 (in 0x0-0x2000_0000).
>
> I would not be the first to plan for a lot of RAM and I understand
> HIGHMEM patch is ok if an extra RAM area is out of reach of kseg1.
Using highmem in general is a baaad idea. The option only exists at all
for MIPS because of a user who didn't want to try something as unorthodox
as 64-bit kernels ...
Highmem implies significant extra overhead and complexity for software
that runs in kernel space. Avoid like the plague if you can.
> But what if my PCI devices I/O do not lie in kseg1? I may program the
> TLB to see them thru kseg2 (but kseg2 seems to be the place where page
> tables are stored...)
Doesn't really matter. It's nice to have devices in the lower 512MB of
physical address space because that means the TLB will not be used - a
nice performance bonus.
Whatever - the driver API to use is ioremap.
> Q2- Most hardware platforms have their SDRAM chips mapped at
> physical address 0x0. Mine does not. Am I going ahead of problems?
It won't work ;-)
You at least need some memory at physical address zero because exception
vectors are located in the first few k of physical address space. Of
course you could avoid that by having the BEV bit set in the status
register so exceptions would go via 0xbfc00000 - but that's an uncached
address, likely even in a flash so performance would go down the drain ...
> It seems to be assumed at a lot of places (I have already ported YAMON).
>
> Q3- I'd rather stick to a 2.4.x linux port. But... should I use:
Depending on what exactly you want to do you should take a look at 2.6.
> a- the latest official 2.4.x kernel
> b- the latest 2.4.x-preY kernel
kernel.org kernels won't work out of the box or at least your chances
are worse due to the lag in merging MIPS code from to kernel.org.
> c- the latest linux-mips.org 2.4.x kernel
> d- cvs -z3 -d :pserver:cvs@ftp.linux-mips.org:/home/cvs co -r linux_2_4
D - where C and D are the basically the same anyway - I've stopped making
snapshot tarballs years ago, so you'll have to fetch from cvs.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-10 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-10 14:24 new platform Emmanuel Michon
2004-05-10 14:53 ` Stanislaw Skowronek
2004-05-10 15:02 ` Emmanuel Michon
2004-05-10 21:49 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2004-05-11 9:22 ` Emmanuel Michon
2004-05-11 10:52 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040510214927.GB22442@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=em@realmagic.fr \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox