From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:44:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from MAIL.13thfloor.at ([IPv6:::ffff:212.16.62.51]:23941 "EHLO mail.13thfloor.at") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:44:27 +0100 Received: by mail.13thfloor.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9B65851026A; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:44:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:44:22 +0200 From: Herbert Poetzl To: Ralf Baechle Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: linux-vserver syscall ... Message-ID: <20040609144422.GA24002@MAIL.13thfloor.at> References: <20040524182915.GA27481@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20040608235400.GA31706@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040608235400.GA31706@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 5270 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: herbert@13thfloor.at Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:54:00AM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:29:15PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > obviously I forgot to ask you to reserve a > > syscall for linux-vserver, and I just discovered > > this as the currently used number (273) was used > > up by some other syscall (in 2.6.7-rc1) ... > > > > so I'm asking you now, could you please reserve > > a syscall for this project, so that we do not > > need to change it on every new kernel release? > > > > here is a list of currently reserved syscalls > > (for other archs) and some links to the project > > (in case you care) > > Not really - other than the fact that I'm reluctant to reserve syscall > numbers for something that might never make it into the kernel so > usually i386 reserving a syscall is what convinces me ... > > Due to the three support ABIs you actually get 3 syscall numbers even. > o32 gets 277, N64 236 and N32 240. Patch is below. thank you very much! best, Herbert > Ralf