From: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
To: Wayne Gowcher <wgowcher@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, jsun@mvista.com
Subject: Re: Should pci driver probe behind a cardbus bridge at boot up ?
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:57:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040721115743.C6813@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040720162349.45167.qmail@web11902.mail.yahoo.com>; from wgowcher@yahoo.com on Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:23:49AM -0700
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:23:49AM -0700, Wayne Gowcher wrote:
> I am having a problem with a Ti cardbus chip and yenta
> on the 2.6.4 mips kernel whereby when yenta tries to
> configure the cardbus chip, it finds all the resources
> busy ( because they have already been allocated in the
> pci driver ) and so starts allocating new ones.
>
> Here's the output of the PCI driver
>
> PCI: Bus 1, cardbus bridge: 0000:00:0c.0
> IO window: 00001000-00001fff
> IO window: 00002000-00002fff
> PREFETCH window: 40000000-41ffffff
> MEM window: 42000000-43ffffff
> PCI: Bus 5, cardbus bridge: 0000:00:0c.1
> IO window: 00003000-00003fff
> IO window: 00004000-00004fff
> PREFETCH window: 44000000-45ffffff
> MEM window: 46000000-47ffffff
>
> and here's what yenta reports:
>
> Yenta: CardBus bridge found at 0000:00:0c.0
> [0000:0000]
> yenta 0000:00:0c.0: Preassigned resource 1 busy,
> reconfiguring...
> Yenta: CardBus bridge found at 0000:00:0c.1
> [0000:0000]
>
>
> When I run the same 2.6.4 kernel compiled for x86 on a
> x86 laptop, the x86 kernel finds the bar 0 registers
> of the cardbus chip and adds them to it's resource
> space, but probes no further. So that later when yenta
> probes the cardbus chip, it can allocate the resources
> without conflict.
>
> I also found the following comment in
> drivers/pci/probe.c pci_scan_bridge :
>
> * If it's a bridge, configure it and scan the bus
> behind it.
> * For CardBus bridges, we don't scan behind as the
> devices will
> * be handled by the bridge driver itself.
>
> But the code does scan behind teh cardbus bridge and
> add resources to iomem_resources and ioport_resources.
>
> So as I wrote in my title, does anyone know if :
>
> the pci driver should probe behind a cardbus bridge at
> boot up or if it should be left to the yenta cardbus ?
>
It should not - me think anyway.
Maybe you can tell us _why_, given the same code, i386 does
not scan behind yenta.
Jun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-21 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-20 16:23 Should pci driver probe behind a cardbus bridge at boot up ? Wayne Gowcher
2004-07-21 18:57 ` Jun Sun [this message]
2004-07-22 16:52 ` Wayne Gowcher
2004-07-22 16:52 ` Wayne Gowcher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040721115743.C6813@mvista.com \
--to=jsun@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=wgowcher@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox