From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:14:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from p508B6C80.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.108.128]:23335 "EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:14:10 +0100 Received: from fluff.linux-mips.net (fluff.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linux-mips.net (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9EKDord009884; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:13:50 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by fluff.linux-mips.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9EKDinY009872; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:13:44 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:13:44 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Bjoern Riemer , ppopov@embeddedalley.com, Linux/MIPS Development Subject: Re: meshcube patch for au1000 network driver Message-ID: <20041014201344.GD5975@linux-mips.org> References: <416BC4D9.2060904@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20041013110947.GA6992@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 6048 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:49:45PM +0200, Bjoern Riemer wrote: > > > i fixed the ioctl support in the net driver to support link detection by > > > ifplugd ond maybe netplugd(not tested) > > > here my patch for > > > drivers/net/au1000.c > > > > Please never ever send ed-style patches, only unified (-u). They're > > totally unreadable and have several technical problems. And preferbly > > inline, not attachment. > > And `-p' helps as wel... True, it makes patches more readable but there seems to be some trouble with -p and cvs diff and I certaily don't consider the non-use any kind of reason for rejecting a patch. Ralf