From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:17:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from pD956212F.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.86.33.47]:53273 "EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:16:59 +0100 Received: from fluff.linux-mips.net (fluff.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linux-mips.net (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9MCGvQM028120; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:16:57 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by fluff.linux-mips.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9MCGmHp028119; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:16:48 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:16:48 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: kernel_thread creation bug? Message-ID: <20041022121647.GA27961@linux-mips.org> References: <20041022.170758.48799763.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041022.170758.48799763.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 6174 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 05:07:58PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > With recent change in kernel_thread(), initial cp0_status value comes > from current C0_STATUS (which does not include EXL bit). Is this > correct? The initial value should contain EXL bit to start the thread > up safely, shouldn't it? Yes ... Ralf