From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:17:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([IPv6:::ffff:212.227.126.185]:9214 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:17:02 +0100 Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DITK0-0000QK-00 for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:17:00 +0200 Received: from [213.39.254.66] (helo=tuxator.satorlaser-intern.com) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DITK0-0004jD-00 for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:17:00 +0200 From: Ulrich Eckhardt Organization: Sator Laser GmbH To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Au1100 FB driver uplift for 2.6 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:17:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504041717.29098.eckhardt@satorlaser.com> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:e35cee35a663f5c944b9750a965814ae Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 7590 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: eckhardt@satorlaser.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Greetings! I'm just looking at these changes and I'm delighted to finally see them in. However, I have one small problem: the old version allowed to program EXTCLK1 and the LCD controller clock via 'mode_toyclksrc' in the panel configuration database[1], but this has been removed (also the 'mode_backlight' member, btw). FYI, on the TTP1100[2], the pixelclock for some displays types is created via EXTCLK1 which doesn't work anymore, which is why I'm asking. Am I on the wrong way or should I just reimplement it and send a patch? Uli [1] I have a few nits on that, too: IMHO it could be made constant and marked as '__initdata' so it is discarded after initialization. [2] Based on DB1100. Are there any pointers on how to port to a new board, btw?