From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:03:16 +0100 (BST) Received: from extgw-uk.mips.com ([IPv6:::ffff:62.254.210.129]:14093 "EHLO bacchus.net.dhis.org") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:02:57 +0100 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bacchus.net.dhis.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j65K3Aj5029278; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:03:10 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j65K3969029277; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:03:09 +0100 Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:03:09 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle DL5RB To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: djohnson+linuxmips@sw.starentnetworks.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: preempt_schedule_irq missing from mfinfo[]? Message-ID: <20050705200308.GE18772@linux-mips.org> References: <17092.5345.75666.403044@cortez.sw.starentnetworks.com> <20050701.114358.21591461.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <17093.19241.353160.946039@cortez.sw.starentnetworks.com> <20050703.005921.25910131.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050703.005921.25910131.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8354 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:59:21AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > Ralf, how do you think about this? If the WCHAN column of ps axl is supposed to be any useful we need to unwind the stack until we find the caller of the sleeping or scheduling function. Very useful for debugging. Ralf