From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:22:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from mx01.qsc.de ([IPv6:::ffff:213.148.129.14]:33732 "EHLO mx01.qsc.de") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:22:03 +0100 Received: from port-195-158-170-192.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.170.192] helo=hattusa.textio) by mx01.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DqVOd-00047i-00; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:22:27 +0200 Received: from ths by hattusa.textio with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DqVOc-0007Yq-N0; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:22:26 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:22:26 +0200 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Thiemo Seufer , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux Message-ID: <20050707122226.GW1645@hattusa.textio> References: <20050707091937Z8226163-3678+1737@linux-mips.org> <20050707121235.GV1645@hattusa.textio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Thiemo Seufer Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8385 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ths@networkno.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > -mel/-meb aren't documented. > > They are: > > $ gcc -v --help 2>/dev/null | egrep 'mel|meb' > -mel Use little-endian byte order > -meb Use big-endian byte order > > They are not in the info pages, but that should probably be considered an > accidental omission. Is using something that's documented but doesn't > work, to the contrary, any better? Probably not. It's just that I've never seen actual use of -mel/-meb yet. Thiemo