From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:50:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from mx02.qsc.de ([IPv6:::ffff:213.148.130.14]:7324 "EHLO mx02.qsc.de") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:50:25 +0100 Received: from port-195-158-179-11.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.179.11] helo=hattusa.textio) by mx02.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1EFC6z-0001ZM-00 for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:50:17 +0200 Received: from ths by hattusa.textio with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EFC6z-0001GH-C9 for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:50:17 +0200 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:50:17 +0200 To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Git Message-ID: <20050913145017.GN32506@hattusa.textio> References: <20050913124544.GC3224@linux-mips.org> <20050913133436.GP23161@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C1iGAkRnbeBonpVg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050913133436.GP23161@lug-owl.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i From: Thiemo Seufer Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8929 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ths@networkno.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips --C1iGAkRnbeBonpVg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-13 07:15:03 -0500, sjhill@realitydiluted.com wrote: > > > As a heads up, I've started playing with GIT as the replacement of CV= S. > > > For information on the status of that conversion please see > > >=20 > > I assume the reason for choosing GIT was because the main line kernel > > uses the same source management tool. No chance of using Subversion I > > guess. >=20 > Is SVN already distributed? In the past, the non-distributed reality > of CVS is what bought me a lot of trouble. And SVN isn't really > designed for distribution, is it? SVN isn't, but SVK (which uses regular SVN) is. > I for one see SVN as a CVS rewrite with some design flaws fixed, but > it's for sure not what I actually want to use. >=20 > So I'm currently learning to use GIT. It's a bit strange when you > start using it (because usually I interact with git itself as well as > with eg. cogito), but I slowly get used to it :-) I think for kernel development git is the way to go. Thiemo --C1iGAkRnbeBonpVg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDJuX/XNuq0tFCNaARAt1XAJ9EhPKO23Sv3MOHwfna4Tj5/nEaKACg+ZbM iJ77MFJ40gMWaecmA4w+zww= =NpPX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C1iGAkRnbeBonpVg--