From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:28:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mx01.qsc.de ([IPv6:::ffff:213.148.129.14]:39081 "EHLO
	mx01.qsc.de") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id <S8225377AbVITU1p>;
	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:27:45 +0100
Received: from port-195-158-179-11.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.179.11] helo=hattusa.textio)
	by mx01.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1EHoiI-000872-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:27:38 +0200
Received: from ths by hattusa.textio with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EHoiH-0003Lj-DL; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:27:37 +0200
Date:	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:27:37 +0200
To:	Pete Popov <ppopov@embeddedalley.com>
Cc:	"'linux-mips@linux-mips.org'" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: stale board ports, again
Message-ID: <20050920202737.GK3386@hattusa.textio>
References: <1127245542.4948.269.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1127245542.4948.269.camel@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
From:	Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Return-Path: <ths@networkno.de>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 9004
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: ths@networkno.de
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips

Pete Popov wrote:
> 
> Is there anyone using the mtx-1, csb250, or xxs1500 in 2.6? If so, how
> badly broken are they and does anyone want to maintain them or is it
> time to nuke them?

I hope to support 2.6 xxs1500 in Debian (stable has 2.4).


Thiemo