From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:10:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from extgw-uk.mips.com ([62.254.210.129]:59409 "EHLO bacchus.net.dhis.org") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S3465585AbVI3QKB (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:10:01 +0100 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bacchus.net.dhis.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8UG9rCQ014050; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:09:53 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8UG9qfL014049; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:09:52 +0100 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:09:52 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Franck Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] minor fix in asm-mips/module.h Message-ID: <20050930160952.GB13616@linux-mips.org> References: <20050926115539.GB3175@linux-mips.org> <20050929234542.GB3983@linux-mips.org> <20050930130928.GA3083@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 9102 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:44:01PM +0200, Franck wrote: > > > 2005/9/30, Ralf Baechle : > > > > There are no CONFIG_CPU_4KSC and CONFIG_CPU_4KSD configuration options. > > > > Did you really create this patch against the linux module of the CVS > > > > repository or was it a different tree? > > > > > > > > > > The patch was created against linux-mips CVS repository. I added 4KSC > > > and 4KSD support in this tree. I thougth seeing reference of 4KSC > > > somewhere. Anyway, if you don't want to include them in your tree > > > that's ok. > > > > It's just that references to CONFIG_* symbols that are being defined > > nowhere don't make sense. If however you want to contribute improved > > support for these processors, by all means I'm certainly going to appreciate > > a patch! > > > > I'm surprised you're interested in added support for 4KSC and 4KSD > cpu...Anyway I could send a trivial patch to you if so. Yes, some people do strange things with Linux :-) Ralf