From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:37:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from extgw-uk.mips.com ([62.254.210.129]:19732 "EHLO bacchus.net.dhis.org") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S3465652AbVJCNhB (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:37:01 +0100 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bacchus.net.dhis.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j93DarfV020332; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:36:53 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j93Daqqt020331; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:36:52 +0100 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:36:52 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Yoichi Yuasa Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: linux-mips Vs kernel.org Message-ID: <20051003133652.GI2624@linux-mips.org> References: <20050927093922.GA3793@linux-mips.org> <20050928005432.7d45b2f9.yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050928005432.7d45b2f9.yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 9124 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:54:32AM +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote: > > > We currently working with the 2.6.12 kernel, and wondering which from > > > linux-mips or kernel.org version we should use, > > > in a more general manner, what are the differences between linux-mips and > > > kernel.org kernel source code, is one the > > > mirror of the other, or is there one that frequently merge with the other > > > ? > > > > At this stage the kernel.org tree is quite unusable for MIPS. > > I have no problem kernel.org GIT with VR41xx. See RFC 1925, section 2 (3): With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. Ralf