From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:12:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from extgw-uk.mips.com ([62.254.210.129]:7697 "EHLO bacchus.net.dhis.org") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S8133471AbVJJLL5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:11:57 +0100 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bacchus.net.dhis.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9ABBoOk007817; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:11:50 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j9ABBo8Y007816; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:11:50 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:11:49 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Carlo Perassi Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: rfc about an uncommented string Message-ID: <20051010111149.GC2661@linux-mips.org> References: <20051009134106.GB9091@voyager> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051009134106.GB9091@voyager> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 9204 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 03:41:06PM +0200, Carlo Perassi wrote: > Hi. > As suggested (*) by Arthur Othieno on the kernel-janitors mailing list, > I bounce here this email for collecting comments. > The old email refers to 2.6.13-rc6 but the code is still the same on > 2.6.14-rc3. > Thank you. > > Hi. > > I'd like to collect some comments about the following code > segment I found in > linux-2.6.13-rc6/arch/mips/ite-boards/generic/it8172_setup.c > (the "^^^" sequence is not mine, it's in the code) I know, I put it there. The code was obviously broken, so I place this hard to miss not right into the middle of it. It's there since ages and nobody did complain. So unless somebody complains - and that complaint better include some patches - I will delete support for the IT8172 and it's eval board. Ralf