From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:26:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from extgw-uk.mips.com ([62.254.210.129]:63238 "EHLO bacchus.net.dhis.org") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S8133850AbVKCO0A (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:26:00 +0000 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bacchus.net.dhis.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA3EQj1a016765; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:26:45 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jA3EQhEH016764; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:26:43 GMT Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:26:43 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove mips_rtc_lock Message-ID: <20051103142642.GA16434@linux-mips.org> References: <20051103.010240.41630907.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20051103110552.GA3149@linux-mips.org> <20051103.231250.25477564.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051103.231250.25477564.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 9418 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:12:50PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:05:53 +0000, Ralf Baechle said: > > ralf> The difference between and get_rtc_time and rtc_get_time is less > ralf> than obvious. Same for set_rtc_time and rtc_set_time ... > > Sure. Also I suppose majority of RTC prefer struct rtc_time than > unsigned long. Is it time for redesign the mips RTC interface? ;-) More than that, the whole MIPS time code while functional is such a beauty it could make a grown man cry ... Ralf