From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:11:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from 81-174-11-161.f5.ngi.it ([81.174.11.161]:43226 "EHLO goldrake.enneenne.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S3686521AbWF2PL2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:11:28 +0100 Received: from zaigor.enneenne.com ([192.168.32.1]) by goldrake.enneenne.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Fvy69-0005DJ-3N; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:06:29 +0200 Received: from giometti by zaigor.enneenne.com with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FvyB0-0004Je-9P; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:11:30 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:11:30 +0200 From: Rodolfo Giometti To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Message-ID: <20060629151130.GM7471@enneenne.com> References: <20060626221441.GA10595@enneenne.com> <20060627155914.GD10595@enneenne.com> <44A3EBD7.8090408@ru.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OxpYUbrsx40GOZXC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44A3EBD7.8090408@ru.mvista.com> Organization: GNU/Linux Device Drivers, Embedded Systems and Courses X-PGP-Key: gpg --keyserver keyserver.linux.it --recv-keys D25A5633 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.32.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: giometti@enneenne.com Subject: Re: au1000_lowlevel_probe on au1000_eth.c X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on goldrake.enneenne.com) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 11887 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: giometti@linux.it Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips --OxpYUbrsx40GOZXC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 07:03:51PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >=20 > This is against your rewrite, if I don't mistake? Yes. > Hrm, wouldn't it be better to put this stuff into a separate function= =20 > then? Maybe, but I considered that these stuff are dignificative only during boot time so I decided to do not consider them during wake up. Is that wrong? Ciao, Rodolfo --=20 GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com Linux Device Driver giometti@gnudd.com Embedded Systems giometti@linux.it UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127 --OxpYUbrsx40GOZXC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEo+2iQaTCYNJaVjMRAtoCAKDdVDCxz0elNeqtA0x4DvZshY1VTQCfQI82 GS1M1TPV2qmIraPLDIvCB54= =i/zV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OxpYUbrsx40GOZXC--