From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
To: David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dump_stack() based on prologue code analysis
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:03:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060727170305.GB4505@networkno.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44C8EFE2.4010102@avtrex.com>
David Daney wrote:
> Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> >Instead of dump all possible address in the stack, unwind the stack
> >frame based on prologue code analysis, as like as get_chan() does.
> >While the code analysis might fail for some reason, there is a new
> >kernel option "raw_show_trace" to disable this feature.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
>
> Let me start by saying I have not analyzed how all this code works, but
> I have done something similar in user space.
>
> Since the kernel ABI does not use gp, many functions may not have a
> prolog (especially when compiled with newer versions of GCC). In the
> user space case, most leaf functions have no prolog. For the kernel I
> would imagine that many non-leaf functions (simple non-leaf functions
> that do only a tail call) would also not have a prolog.
Non-leaves have to save/restore $31 somewhere, so there should be a
prologue.
Thiemo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-27 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-26 14:22 [PATCH] dump_stack() based on prologue code analysis Atsushi Nemoto
2006-07-27 14:33 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2006-07-27 19:03 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2006-07-28 8:16 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2006-07-28 16:08 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-07-28 16:01 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-07-31 9:15 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2006-07-31 13:39 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-07-31 14:32 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2006-07-31 15:33 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-07-31 15:51 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2006-07-31 15:59 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-07-28 15:44 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-07-31 8:45 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2006-07-27 16:54 ` David Daney
2006-07-27 17:03 ` Thiemo Seufer [this message]
2006-07-27 17:27 ` David Daney
2006-07-27 18:51 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2006-07-27 19:12 ` Thiemo Seufer
2006-07-28 14:38 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-07-28 17:05 ` David Daney
2006-07-28 17:34 ` Nigel Stephens
2006-07-28 18:32 ` David Daney
2006-07-28 19:31 ` Thiemo Seufer
2006-07-29 14:25 ` Atsushi Nemoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060727170305.GB4505@networkno.de \
--to=ths@networkno.de \
--cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--cc=ddaney@avtrex.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox