From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Dave Johnson <djohnson+linux-mips@sw.starentnetworks.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: wrong SP restored after DBE exception
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:28:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060928142840.GB3394@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0609281448310.3949@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:56:29PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > If we take a DBE exception in this code we're in trouble and I've seen
> > systems delivering DBEs highly asynchronously. Afar the Broadcom SOCs
> > fall into that class.
> >
> > So the interesting part is if we take a data bus exception between
> > the stack pointer adjustment and and before EXL is cleared. We're taking
> > a nested exception so c0_epc and c0_cause.bd will not be updated. So
> > when the bus error handler will save the $sp value it saw on entry but
> > will return to the EPC of the first exception, that is only one stack
> > frame will be popped. Whops ...
>
> It looks like a design issue -- further asynchronous bus error exceptions
> should be blocked till one currenly being handled has been acked. In fact
> if they are asynchronous, then it really makes no sense to use the
> exception and a general interrupt should be used instead -- the whole
> point of using an exception here is the ability to stop a data corrupting
> transaction, as unlike an interropt, an exception can be precise.
I would suggest to disable interrupts around accesses that potencially
could result in DB exceptions and just to make sure he is not getting
trapped by a non-blocking load by making some use of any value read
from the device. Writes could be posted depending on bus type. So
having a read from the same device would force the write to complete.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-28 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-27 19:53 wrong SP restored after DBE exception Dave Johnson
2006-09-28 13:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-09-28 13:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-09-28 14:28 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2006-09-28 14:34 ` Dave Johnson
2006-09-28 17:55 ` Dave Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060928142840.GB3394@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=djohnson+linux-mips@sw.starentnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox