From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:10:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:46002 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20038850AbWJMOKy (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:10:54 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k9DEB4GV020986; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:11:04 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k9DEB21Y020984; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:11:02 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:11:01 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Antonio SJ Musumeci Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: patch: include/asm-mips/system.h __cmpxchg64 bugfix and cleanup Message-ID: <20061013141101.GA19260@linux-mips.org> References: <200610121802.k9CI26I5017308@ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com> <20061013104250.GA16820@linux-mips.org> <452F9A41.4020505@landofbile.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <452F9A41.4020505@landofbile.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 12943 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:53:05AM -0400, Antonio SJ Musumeci wrote: > Should I apply my patch on top of this one? No, the two patches conflict in what they're doing. The important part of your patch, the fix to the if condition I've already applied. Ralf