From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [patch] [RFC] Kexec on MIPS
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:31:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061018143129.GB3498@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610181514.56081.nschichan@freebox.fr>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:14:55PM +0200, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
> I have implemented kexec support for the mips architecture, the code is
> available in the attached patch (for 2.6.18 kernel). This code works fine on
> the mips boards I use at work (one in big endian and one in little endian) and
> on qemu.
Cool!
> However it has not been tested on 64 bit mips and it may not work on
> those architectures.
Aside of a nit in a 32-bit specific comment the code is looking good. See
below.
> It may also not work on machines with more than 512 megabytes as the kexec
> generic code may fill the page list with adresses over the 512 megabytes
> limit (the mips boards I use only have 16mbytes and 32mbytes ram).
This is only an issue with 32-bit software anyway. On these you can solve
the problem by manually setting up TLB mappings. You may want to take a
look at kmap_coherent in arch/mips/mm/init.c for how to create such
temporary mappings.
> A tiny userland application loading the kernel and invoking kexec_load for
> mips is available here:
>
> http://chac.le-poulpe.net/~nico/kexec/kexec-2006-10-18.tar.gz
>
> Do not hesitate to comment on this patch,
Without having tested this, this actually looks quite fine for the first
cut. My nits are these:
+ /*
+ * The generic kexec code builds a page list with physical
+ * addresses. they are directly accessible through KSEG0,
+ * hence the pys_to_virt() call.
+ */
On a 64-bit system this could actually be either an XKPHY or CKSEG address,
depending on PAGE_OFFSET.
+ /*
+ * we do not want to be bothered.
+ */
+ local_irq_disable();
+
+ flush_icache_range(reboot_code_buffer,
+ reboot_code_buffer + KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_SIZE);
+
+ printk("Will call new kernel at %08x\n", image->start);
+ printk("Bye ...\n");
+ flush_cache_all();
+ ((void (*)(void))reboot_code_buffer)();
On SMP systems cache flushes may invoke smp_call_function which will barf
when called with interrupts disabled. So you may want to move the
local_irq_disable further down to somewhere after the last flush.
Your code does not try to deal with SMP at all. The strategy used by
Linux to get hold of processors 1 and up on bootup relies on the
firmware. Generally firmware breaks because Linux tramples over it and
even if it would survive that, it does not regain control over non-boot
processors, so starting of those processors would fail.
The solution I have in mind would be something like:
* The trampoline that transfers control between the old and new kernel
needs to be modified to keep all additional processors in some sort of
spinlock.
* A kernel needs a way to know if it has been executed via kexec or a
normal bootup. It uses this knowledge to release one non-boot
processor after another during SMP initialization.
Ralf
PS: If you have to send patches as attachments, then please as text/plain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-18 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-18 13:14 [patch] [RFC] Kexec on MIPS Nicolas Schichan
2006-10-18 14:31 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2006-10-18 21:21 ` Nicolas Schichan
2006-10-18 21:37 ` Nicolas Schichan
2006-10-18 22:38 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 14:16 ` Nicolas Schichan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061018143129.GB3498@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=nschichan@freebox.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox