From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:48:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:15302 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20038566AbWJSRsX (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:48:23 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k9JHmhXx005396; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:48:43 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k9JHmfdk005395; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:48:41 +0100 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:48:41 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Yoichi Yuasa , vagabon.xyz@gmail.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][MIPS] merge a few printk in check_wait() Message-ID: <20061019174840.GA5195@linux-mips.org> References: <20061019002718.1ca0ec56.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> <45364F82.8030308@innova-card.com> <20061018161551.GA15530@linux-mips.org> <20061019170709.54a8b9a6.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 13039 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > > Or more radical, just getting rid of the printk entirely? It doesn't > > > provide very useful information. > [...] > > I agree with you. > > I updated my patch. > > You might consider removing "Checking for..." in that case as well. I acutally already have such a patch on the queue tree. Ralf