From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:43:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:17280 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20022314AbXCMQnE (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:43:04 +0000 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2DGf8C6005354; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:41:08 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l2DGf7KI005353; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:41:07 GMT Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:41:07 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Peter Watkins , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Have sigpoll and sigio band field match glibc for n64 Message-ID: <20070313164107.GA5004@linux-mips.org> References: <1173469586997-git-send-email-pwatkins@sicortex.com> <20070310132423.GA1295@linux-mips.org> <20070313141951.GA3206@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070313141951.GA3206@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 14457 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:19:51AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > This will break the ABI only for uses of si_band and si_fd, and only > on n64. Anyone see a reason why I shouldn't change glibc? > > Ralf, as I mentioned on IRC, I've got bigger worries about siginfo. > Shouldn't n32 be using the same siginfo as o32? It's got pointers in it. Yes, you're right. Will you cook up a patch? Ralf