From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:47:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:11447 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20021465AbXCNNrO (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:47:14 +0000 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2EDjDxe025104; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:45:13 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l2EDjCHM025103; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:45:12 GMT Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:45:12 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Yoichi Yuasa Cc: linux-mips Subject: Re: [PATCH][MIPS] merge GT64111 PCI routines and GT64120 PCI_0 routines Message-ID: <20070314134511.GA24290@linux-mips.org> References: <20070314215126.72d21e96.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070314215126.72d21e96.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 14466 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:51:26PM +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote: > This patch has merged GT64111 PCI routines and GT64120 PCI_0 routines. > GT64111 PCI is almost the same as GT64120's PCI_0. > This patch don't change GT64120 PCI routines. > > This patch tested on Cobalt Qube2. > > Please queue for 2.6.22. Will do. This sort of cleanup is something I meant to do for a long time. We have other fairly similar chips such as the GT-64240 used in the Ocelot G and the GT-64340 used in the Ocelot 3 which both are supported by arch/mips/pci/ops-marvell.c. There are many other PCI busses which are virtually identical. Thanks, Ralf