Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IOC3: Switch to pci refcounting safe APIs
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:35:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070423143507.GA8877@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070423151918.477ffb6a@the-village.bc.nu>

On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:19:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> > > +static int ioc3_adjacent_is_ioc3(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct pci_dev *dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(pdev->bus->number, 
> > > +							PCI_DEVFN(dev, 0));
> > 
> >    The same question: isn't pci_get_bus() better in this case?
> 
> Makes no real difference, but if you know the MIPS tree never ends up
> with pdev->bus = NULL for the root bus then its a trivial change

That's the case on MIPS.

> >    I don't see the point of using refcounting API in such cases but well...
> 
> Two reasons
> 
> 1.	It makes the entire system more consistent
> 2.	It means we can remove the (usually) unsafe pci_find_slot API
> 
> (and #3 sort of... it means the pci fake hotplug testing works with this
> device too)

The patch looks ok to me:

Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

Longer term MENET should be handled differently but this patch certainly
doesn't make things worse.

  Ralf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-23 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-23 14:06 [PATCH] IOC3: Switch to pci refcounting safe APIs Alan Cox
2007-04-23 14:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-04-23 14:19   ` Alan Cox
2007-04-23 14:21     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-04-23 14:35     ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2007-04-23 15:18       ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070423143507.GA8877@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox