From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 31 May 2007 11:22:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:29379 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20025481AbXEaKUN (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2007 11:20:13 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4VAJms0022195; Thu, 31 May 2007 11:20:01 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l4SDH3DV010483; Mon, 28 May 2007 14:17:03 +0100 Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:17:03 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Fuxin Zhang Cc: guanzb@lemote.com, Martin Michlmayr , debian-mips@lists.debian.org, Linux/MIPS Development Subject: Re: Several packages whose page size is 4k. Message-ID: <20070528131703.GA10298@linux-mips.org> References: <464A7C53.3010309@lemote.com> <464A805C.5020606@ict.ac.cn> <20070516081555.GA22169@networkno.de> <464AC466.4000907@lemote.com> <20070516085737.GD22169@networkno.de> <20070516094617.GJ19816@deprecation.cyrius.com> <464ADF9B.6050602@lemote.com> <464AE59E.2070004@ict.ac.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <464AE59E.2070004@ict.ac.cn> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 15202 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:06:06PM +0800, Fuxin Zhang wrote: > Zhibin.Guan 写道: > > We have already commit kernel patches to linux-mips. > > but, it seems that they have no reaction and response to that. > To be fair, Ralf do response, I remembered that the last question he > asked was related to alsa patches, but we have nobody to handle that. > > Maybe that part can be ignored presently and let us make the necessary > parts in first. > > What is your opinion, Ralf? (My personal email setup had a hickup and so about 9MB of email from around the week of the 16/5 were stuck in a temp file. If there is anything that you're still waiting for an answer, please let me know.) The ALSA patch solves a generic ALSA/MIPS issue, so independent of the rest. So I suggest we tackle the rest of the Fulong patchset separately. Just resend the Fulong patchset once the issues I raised have been resolved. Ralf