From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:03:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from wf1.mips-uk.com ([194.74.144.154]:7146 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20027087AbXFFRDx (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 18:03:53 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l56Gwr3t032092; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 17:58:53 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l56GwqD8032091; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 17:58:52 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 17:58:52 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Tian Cc: Kumba , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Mailing patches Message-ID: <20070606165852.GC29713@linux-mips.org> References: <20070604133551.GA24405@linux-mips.org> <4664DB12.80906@gentoo.org> <20070605152338.GA22937@linux-mips.org> <4666418C.9040401@lemote.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4666418C.9040401@lemote.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 15306 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:09:32PM +0800, Tian wrote: > sorry for the mess，when git-format-patch , wo forgot the -n para > and i would like to know what command para is recommended for sending > patch on maillist? > > git-send-email --no-chain-reply-to --compose --from tiansm@lemote.com > --no-signed-off-by-cc --smtp-server --subject "Lemote Loongson > 2E patch update" --suppress-from --to linux-mips@linux-mips.org 00* > > --no-chain-reply-to or --chain-reply-to ? > > and.....should i resend the patches? No, that's fine. I don't like --no-chain-reply-to for no better reason than that looking a bit odd in some threded mail readers. But that's just a matter of preference not a technical need. The ordering of patches is guaranteed even without chain reply mode because git-send-email will ensure the dates of each email is different from the previous one. Ralf