From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:44:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:9105 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20022869AbXG2Oom (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:44:42 +0100 Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id l6TEiaA5028856 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:44:36 +0200 Received: (from hch@localhost) by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id l6TEiaEN028854; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:44:36 +0200 Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:44:36 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: maximilian attems , ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, klibc@zytor.com Subject: Re: [klibc] klibc kernelheaders build failure on mips/mipsel Message-ID: <20070729144436.GA28703@lst.de> References: <20070729095217.GE7448@stro.at> <46AC997B.2030706@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46AC997B.2030706@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 15923 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hch@lst.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 06:43:23AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > i'm not sure if you want to export both headers in the make > > kernelheaders target or if it is the fault of klibc to assume > > that those are available? > > > > If I remember correctly (sorry, I'm on the road at the moment), those > files should be exportable. They wouldn't be all that hard to replicate > in klibc, though. Both headers contain cpp macros for assembly code to work with the mariads of mips ABIs. I don't think the kernel should export those headers. And yes, they're both quite trivial.