From: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de (Thomas Bogendoerfer)
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:59:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070822065930.GA6459@alpha.franken.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80708211341s63f8c1eau922f018e66db49f4@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 05:41:04PM -0300, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> On 8/21/07, Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 07:35:50PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > > Are there any architectures still requiring a gcc < 4.0 ?
> >
> > Yes, sadly in some places (embedded) there are people with older
> > compiler who want newer kernels.
>
> Last time I tried a mips build, it would fail the compile unless I was
> using _exactly_ 3.4.4 (I didn't tried older versions, but did try
> 3.4.6, for ex.). So I also think the 3.4 series will still have to be
> around for a while.
that's fixed and I'm happiliy building the MIPS tree with gcc 3.3.3.
And I would be very unhappy to upgrade all my crosscompiler just because
someone thinks nobody build -rc kernel with older compilers. I do.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-22 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070821132038.GA22254@ff.dom.local>
[not found] ` <20070821093103.3c097d4a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <20070821173550.GC30705@stusta.de>
[not found] ` <20070821182505.GA20968@puku.stupidest.org>
2007-08-21 20:41 ` RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-08-21 20:56 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-21 21:01 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-08-22 6:59 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer [this message]
2007-08-22 18:15 ` Ralf Baechle
[not found] ` <20070821191959.GC2642@bingen.suse.de>
[not found] ` <20070821195433.GE30705@stusta.de>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708211306560.30176@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20070821202113.GF30705@stusta.de>
[not found] ` <27c412eea99f1f80a3002e9668bd31f8@kernel.crashing.org>
[not found] ` <20070821212129.GG30705@stusta.de>
[not found] ` <17c0b56b663fce6f28b46e3c42dfbaf9@kernel.crashing.org>
2007-08-22 6:07 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070822065930.GA6459@alpha.franken.de \
--to=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox